Friday, October 28, 2005
What to watch for in Foxborough
The Bills are horrible against the run and they can't pass either. In their last 11 games they've failed to throw for 200 yards. It's been 37 games since they've thrown for 300. People are calling for JP Losman to be the starter over Holcombe, conceding this season and letting the kid learn on the job. That leads me to believe the key to the game for the Pats is to stack the line of scrimmage and stop McGahee at all cost. The Pats will once again play a soft zone D in the secondary, but against such a feeble passing attack that should be effective enough. The whole game will rest on the ability to stuff the run. On the other side of the ball, the experts are expecting this to be Dillon's break out game. The Bills are weak up the middle since the loss of Pat Williams and they have an undersized middle line backer. I've said this before and been completely wrong, but watch for Belichick to use Watson/Graham a lot this week vs the aging Lawyer Milloy. If Milloy has to worry about covering those guys, he can't be hovering around the line of scrimmage in run support.
The Pats should be able to score at will against this team, so it's really just a question of what the Defense will do. Buffalo is very strong on special teams, especially Terrence McGee. He averages 34.5 yds/return and could run one back any time. A bad special teams play could make the difference in this game if the Defense doesn't show up.
My pick is the Pats by two TD's 34-20. Dillon will have 80-90 yds and a TD. Branch will have 8-10 catches and two TD's and one of the TE's will have a TD.
Wednesday, October 26, 2005
ESPN Power Rankings...and a little rant...
#2 Pitt
#3 Atlanta
x
x
x
x
x
x
#10 Giants
#11 Pats.
If the Colts are so high and mighty, and "by far the best team in the league" then why are the Patriots favored to beat Indy next week? As a matter of fact, one Vegas insider said that the Pats game is tho ONLY game all season in which the Colts will be underdogs. Frauds.
Dare I Question....
What happened to the 'genius' tandem of Belichick and Pioli? It looks to me that they happened to get lucky and had one great draft and have been suspect ever since. Mankins and Kaczur have been consistant performers from this years draft. Who else can you name from the draft? Matt Cassell? Do we need another QB? Here's the rest of this years class: Hobbs CB (IR) Sanders S(has to play ineffecrtive saftey due to injuries) Ryan Claridge LB(IR) Andy Stokes TE (released).
I really wish I could say better things about this years' free agents: Beisel and Brown have been disappointing. It would have been nice to see experienced, veteran guys be able to pick up Belichick's D. Maybe the return of Bruschi will allow for Brown and Beisel to perform better as 'role players' rather than as starters. Andre Davis has yet to get on the field. Duane Starks probably shouldn't be on the field either. Chad Scott played OK at best, but is also hurt. So far the biggest FA acquisition has been Tim Dwight. He's had 3 big catches and has really helped the punt return game.
You may be thinking that Belichick and Pioli had a down year. So what, right? They're entitled to one bad year. Doesn't this class reek like the 2002 FA class after the first SB win? A FA class that failed to make an impact and the team ended up 9-7? (see Donald Hayes and Steve Martin) Oh yeah, Bill and Scott messed that up too.
What about last year's draft? Other than having Vince Wilfork fall into their laps at #21 (he was SUPPOSED to be a top 10 pick), the Pats got Ben Watson. Ben Watson has had one good game so far in his career. Then they got Marquise Hill who is contributing a little this year, Guss Scott who was a disappointment at Safety before being placed on IR, Dexter Reid who got cut this year and plays for INDY, Cedric Cobbs-cut, PK Sam-practice squad, Christian Morton-cut.
Obviously, injuries and the sudden retirement of Ted Johnson were unseen, and unplanned for. I'm just saying that maybe these two guys have been a little over-rated around here for the last 4 years. Remember they've already traded away two of next years picks, so they are already at a disadvantage for next off season.
Maybe it was too much to ask for them to continue drafting the likes of Seymour money, Brady, Light, Koppen, Wilson, Wilfork, Green and Warren.
Wednesday, October 19, 2005
Roster moves, Injury updates and the Colts

Tedy Bruschi was activated and practiced today. According to all accounts he looked just fine. It was a non-contact practice.
Among other roster moves, Guss Scott has been placed on IR. Wesley Mallard was released, CB Hank Poteat and WR Andre Davis were re-signed. Davis may be an indication that Troy Brown is hurt pretty badly. Brown did not practice today as well as Dillon and McGinnest. Seymour money returned to practice and the pats were in the 3-4 defense STILL!!
ESPN's power rankings for this week:
1 Colts "Clearly number one...established themselves as the league's elite team...defense leading the way. FRAUDS
2 Broncos
3 Cincinnati
4 Atlanta (Hey, didn't the Pats beat Atlanta? AT Atlanta?)
5 Tampa Bay (They don't even have a starting QB)
6 Philli
7 Dallas
8 Pittsburgh (Hey, didn't the Pats beat Pitt? AT Pitt?)
9 San Diego
10 Jacksonville (They're kidding, right?)
11 Seattle (If I could revise my NFC Champion pick, I'd pick Seattle)
12 Patriots
Do you think the ESPN guys know something that we don't? Are they the 12th best team in the league? I for one certainly don't think so.
Why does it irk me so much that the Colts are everyone's darling this year? Because they are frauds. Ever since Peyton Manning has been in the league, they've tried to get him a superbowl ring. The Pats beat the snot out of the Colts, so the league changes the rules to allow receivers to run free. Manning can't beat the Pats in Foxborough, so the league gives the Pats the hardest 6 game start it can find, while the Colts play nobody's. Now Peyton can have his home field in the AFC Championship v. the Pats. Of course, the Pats will still win (ask the Steelers) only this year Peyton won't have the weather as an excuse. Here's a quick look at Peyton's Pathetic path of pansies so far this season.
Baltimore, 2-3 22nd in O 2nd in D
J'ville, 4-2 25th in O 4th in D
Cleveland 2-3 26th in O 27th in D
Tenn'see 2-4 19th in O 20th in D
San Fran 1-4 31st in O, last in D
St Louis 2-4 3rd in O, 26th in D (3 possesions 3 scores b4 Bulger hurt)
And THIS weeks MONSTER opponent?
Houston 0-5 32nd in O, 29th in D (whats the spread, 100 pts?)
That's a combined record of 13-25. Yeah, OK ESPN guys, I'd say you're right, the Colts are the best team in the league. I'm sure they'll come up with some perfectly legit excuse for Peyton after he loses at the Pats. Oh, did I fail to mention that poor Peyton has to come here to play? The league hooked him up there too. He comes here after his bye week.
In an unrelated story, the NFL announced it will be changing it's name to WLP starting in the 2006-2007 season. (We Love Peyton)
Foxborough...we have a problem....BUT
Once again 3-3 going into the bye is just like starting the season over at 0-0. They have an extra week to get some guys back (Poole, Seymour money, McGinnest, Beisel, Scott, Dillon, Brown, etc and BRUSCHI). They should also get back to the drawing board. Even with all of the injuries, they stayed in a 3-4, plain coverage, almost prevent defense so they wouldn't get burned on the long play. How'd that work for'em? It is time to get back to the 4-3 and utilize the strength of this team, the D-Line. Take the reigns off these guys. Typically, in BB's defense, the D Line hit the O Line and watch to see where the play is going and then fill the gap to either side of the O line guy. (2 gap system) Forget it Bill, you're getting torched that way. Not that I would attempt to hold a candle to BB's knowledge, but if that hasn't worked AT ALL, why not try something different. Here's an idea: Let them play!!!! Go to the 4-3, and let Seymour, Green, Wilfork and Warren get upfield on the snap, let them penetrate, let them get into the backfield and get some sacks and tackles for a loss. Maybe the pressure might even lead to, of all things, a TURNOVER! If the cover guys can't cover anyway, why not attack? What's the worse thing that could happen, they give up one or two big plays a game? They're already allowing that!
Here's some of the uglilness so far this season, the Pats are:
30th in takeaways with 3. Only Houston and Washington are worse.
25th in run defense. 125 yds/game
32nd (LAST) in red zone Defense. 19 trips, 15 TD's and 4 field goals
31st in first down Defense. They allow 6.4 yds/play on 1st down.
Here's some of the bright spots (Tom Brady):
3rd in passing offense, 295 yds/game
8th in first downs gained with 120
2nd in sacks allowed, only 7 sacks in 232 pass attempts - but that's ALL on Brady getting
rid of the ball, because you will never convince me that they've protected him this year.
How many times did you wince last week when Brady got hit? How many times have you
seen a blitzer come through untouched this season?
It HAS been pretty bad this year, but with the competition in the division being so bad, the Pats could probably go 9-7 and still win the division. I'm looking for a big turn around after the bye. With the remaining schedule they should only have a MAX of 3 more losses. MAYBE at Kansas City, MAYBE one division game, and VERY MAYBE to Indy, but I think that will be a statement game for the Pats. IF they do lose three more that still puts them comfortably in the playoffs at 10-6. So fear not Pats fans, it's bad but it can only get better.
I believe we have a faithful reader that is a Doctor. Hey Bryan, can you give us some medical insight on what's going on with Bruschi?
Monday, October 17, 2005
Almost Another Fantastic Comeback

Go on, admit it. You just knew that Tom Brady was going to lead them back for another fantastic come from behind win. I know I did. But don't go blaming Brady for this loss. He showed just how great he really is: on the road, in a hostile stadium, taking hit after hit, with barely any running game to speak of, with the defense knowing he was going to pass, with no Troy Brown, no starting left tackle and he STILL would have won the game had it not been for a drop. There should be no doubt who the best player in the NFL is.
So we have to cope with another tough loss. I believe the game would have had an entirely different outcome if it weren't for 4 plays.
The first play happened on the Pats 1st posession. They are driving and come up just short of the first down. Brady lines them up to go for it on 4th and we all know the play the Pats use on 4th and short and so did Denver. Brady gets to the line, the backfield empties, the TE's split wide, Brady's going to sneak for the first down. Only Denver knew it too and as soon as the Pats motioned to an empty backfield one of the Denver outside linebackers went running to the middle, right over the ball waiting for Brady. Brady called timeout and they kicked. Had they gotten a first down it may have meant 7 points instead of 3.
Second, Vinatieri missed a field goal wide right. Add those 3 points to the 4 from play one and you're only down by one.
Third, The bomb to Ashley Lelie. I know, what about the bomb to Rod Smith, right? Smith's caught the Pats off gaurd. The Lelie bomb was the EXACT SAME play as Smith's. Fool me once shame on you, fool me twice shame on me. Belichick/Mangini should have shown the secondary why/how they got beat so it wouldn't happen again. I know, what about Tatum Bell's 65 yard run, right? That's just what Bell does. He did it twice last week.
Fourth, David 'butter fingers' Givens dropping the pass on the final drive. Not only was he open, not only did Brady lay it out there perfectly, not only did he have 20 or 30 more yards to run, but he also took away the Pats momentum on that drive. The next play was the intentional grounding, which Givens and Branch ran the same route and one of them should have been where Brady threw it. Then it was 3rd and 20 and Brach dropped his ball, but at least he had some semblence of an excuse for dropping his. (And in my humble opinion that play should have been reviewed because it sure looked to me like he caught it, tucked it, got hit and then it came out AFTER he hit the ground.)
That's it. 4 plays.
Hat's off to Patrick Pass who played a terrific game.
Since Rodney Harrison has been with the Pats, their longest run allowed was 33 yards against San Fran last year when the backups were in. The next longest run was in 2003 and that was 19 yards. How good is Rodney Harrison?
I'm not going to tell you what you already know about Tedy Bruschi.
The trade deadline in the NFL is week 6 (tomorrow). Rumors are flying, I'll see what I can come up with.
Thanks for waiting for me to return, I'll try to make it worth your while.
Monday, October 03, 2005
Time Out

Patriots Report is going on vacation starting now. It's my 5th annivesary and we're going away. Apparently, the way the Pats are playing right now it's a good time to be away.
I get the strange feeling watching this years team. It kind of feels like 2002, the year after they won their first superbowl. Do you know what I mean? Where you have very high expectations, but for some reason that no one can put a finger on, they just don't win. Remember that 9-7 year? I do and I'm praying that this is not a repeat.
I don't know when I'll get to post again, maybe prior to the Bronco's game.
See you in Jamaica!
PS - Feel free to fill the comments log with your opinions of the Falcons game so I can get a feel for what happened. PLEASE?
Friday, September 30, 2005
It's Wilson's Time
An early return for BRUSCHI?
In today's Herald there is a story on Tedy Bruschi and how hard it has been for him to stand on the sidelines and watch. "Bruschi aches to play. That much is evident just by looking into his eyes. And while he's stated that he won't be returning until the 2006 season, don't be surprised if he at least pursues all avenues toward making a swifter return. Word is, in fact, Bruschi is back seeking doctors, aaparently hoping to gather enough information and datat to see if it might be in the realm of possibility to come back sooner than he had planned."
He's NOT on IR. He's on the PUP and can return after week 6.
"It's interesting then when asked yesterday about the possibilty of returning this season, Brushi offered a flat, 'No comment.' Bruschi's agent, Brad Blank, wouldn't comment."
_____________________________________________
In his first interview with the media since the injury, Rodney Harrison says, "I know I can come back from this."
Amos Zereoue (FROM?) will wear #31. Don't expect to see too much of him this weekend though.
Marquiis Hill walked trough the locker room yesterday without any obvious sign of injury and NO crutches. - A VERY good sign.
Tom Brady has played in 22 games decided by 6 points or less. He is 20-2.
(Amos Zeroue is from The University of West Virginia.)
Thursday, September 29, 2005
Mid-Week Notes
Released: Wesley Mallard LB & Andre Davis WR
(that means the 5th round pick they gave for Davis was a waste)
Injured Reserve: Rodney Harrison S
(He's out for the year, but there may be hope for Light who is not on IR)
Signed: Amos Zereoue RB & Mike Stone S
(Mruczkowski OL was re-signed to the practice squad)
The Zereoue signing was an indication that the injury o Faulk was pretty serious. Yesterday we learned that he will be out up to 8 weeks. Speaking of injuries, here is the Pats injury report for Sunday's game v. Chargers:
Kevin Faulk RB Out Foot
Matt Light T Out Leg
Tully Banta-Cain LB Questionable Knee
Randall Gay CB Questionable Ankle
Brandon Gorin T Questionable Thigh
Marquise Hill DE Questionable Ankle
James Sanders S Questionable Ankle
Duane Starks CB Questionable Thigh
Tyrone Poole CB Questionable Ankle
Chad Scott CB Questionable Shoulder
Tom Brady QB Probable Right Shoulder
Once again, the injuries to the secondary are a major concern, but maybe more so is the injury that no one talked about - Marquise Hill. It's hard to play the dominating 4-3 Defense without a sub on the D line. Hill provides quality depth at DL and his injury might force a 3-4 alignment this week unless the Pats want to play Mike Wright or Dan Klecko.
Here are some interesting numbers from Mike Reiss:
As if we weren't already convinced that Brady's the best
21 -- The number of receptions by Deion Branch through three games, second among all AFC receivers. Denver's Rod Smith is the AFC leader (22). Branch’s reception total is tied for fifth in the NFL.
31 -- Consecutive games played in which Deion Branch has recorded at least one reception.
78 -- The number of completions by Tom Brady through three games, leading the NFL. Philadelphia’s Donovan McNabb ranks second with 77 completions.
948 -- The number of passing yards for Tom Brady through three games, ranking second in the NFL. McNabb leads all passers with 964 yards.
43 -- The number of passing first downs earned by Tom Brady through three games, ranking third in the NFL. St. Louis’ Marc Bulger and McNabb are tied for the lead with 45 first downs.
4 -- The number of rushing touchdowns by Corey Dillon through three games, ranking second in the AFC behind San Diego’s LaDainian Tomlinson (6 touchdowns). Dillon’s total is tied for third in the NFL with Chicago’s Thomas Jones and Carolina’s Stephen Davis, behind Tomlinson (6) and Seattle’s Shawn Alexander (5).
11.0 -- The average number of yards per punt return for Tim Dwight (9 returns, 99 yards), ranking second in the AFC. As a team, the Patriots averaged 5.8 yards per return in 2004.
1 -- The ranking of the Patriots’ pass offense among all AFC teams. New England has averaged 300.3 passing yards per game this season. The Patriots rank second in the NFL, trailing only the Philadelphia Eagles.
1 -- Tom Brady’s ranking among AFC passers in yards (948), completions (78) and passing attempts (123).
65 -- Consecutive games in which Tom Brady has started at quarterback.
57 -- Consecutive games in which Matt Light has started at left tackle, a streak in jeopardy after he suffered an injury in Sunday’s game.
34 -- Consecutive field goals made by Adam Vinatieri of 47 yards or fewer
If any of your friends are into Sport, tell'em you heard it here at the Pats Report!
Wednesday, September 28, 2005
That's More Like It!
This is how rediculous the QB rating system is. It is OBVIOUS to anyone who watched this week's game that Brady is by far the better QB. Not according to the QB rating system. Brady scored a 92.7 for Sunday and Roethlisberger a 93.7 - Meaningless statistic.
Tom Brady 12-12 in the fourth quarter on the road vs Blitzburgh, he's the best.
I'd like to have a moment of silence for the loss of Rodney Harrison. Rodney was a true leader, the epitome of what a football player should be and he will be missed. Word is that this injury will pretty much end his career. (torn ACL, MCL and PCL) His knee is worse than mine!
Matt Light MAY return late in the season, and the rookies did well filling in for him with the exception of the one play. However, Pitt did not have an entire week to gameplan to confuse the rookies with blitzes and schemes - San Diego does.
This weeks ESPN power rankings:
1 Colts (why?)
2 Patriots (why?)
3 Philly (they love mcnabb/owens)
4 Cincinnati (we'll see how long that lasts)
5 Pittsburgh (they deserve it!)
Maybe I WILL be able to post afterall!!!!!!!

