Wednesday, November 08, 2006

Let's Get To It

We've got a LOT to cover today, so let's get to it.

FIRST, THE INDY GAME.

Indy was very impressive to me on Sunday night. Manning was fantastic, Harrison was un-human, and the defense really brought it. I think you'd expect their offense to be impressive, it always is. However, their defense really impressed me in this game. I'm not talking just the 5 turnovers. They out physicalled the Pats in this game. The hit hard and often, gang tackled and tried to create those turnovers. That's the way the Pats D used to treat the Colts offense in days of old when they'd beat the Colts. (both on the scoreboard and physically). The Pats never really hit anyone, they just tackled or watched the Colt players run out of bounds. They played soft. If ever Indy looked like they could win a Superbowl it is this year.

This post will be a return to the "get rid of McDaniels" campaign. I got a little soft on him when the Pats won a couple of games in a row but let's face it, the play calling against the Colts was just aweful. Once again, you might say they played soft. In the first half you saw 22 power running plays,to out physical and wear down Indy's D. However, they would run successfully to a point then give up and throw. Prime example is the first series of the game: After the cheap offensive pass interference call and it was 2nd and 21 Dillon runs for 10yds, Brady completes 2 in a row to Watson and Jackson. Then Maroney runs for 12, Maroney for 6 Dillon for 7, Dillon for 4 yds to the Indy 34. Then deep pass to triple coverage, ill advised pass intercepted. WHY PASS? On that series they were keeping Manning on the bench, and running for 39yds at 7.8yds per carry. Stick with it, it's working! If you think it was a good idea to try to go over the top, I'll give you that, but then the blame is squarely on Brady for a terrible throw. In the first half the Pats ran 22 times for 98 yds at 4.4 yds per carry. 22 more runs might have produce over 200 yds total for the game, right? "Yeah, but who wants that, let's get cute." That's what I imagine McDaniels saying at half time. Second half included a mere 11 more runs. ONLY 4 to Maroney, only THREE to Dillon. 4 of those rushes were draw plays to Faulk. WHAT THE FAULK!!!! Where was the POWER running game? No, get cute and try to use double fake reverse passes instead. The run was clearly effective, Brady clearly was not sharp, the recievers were obviously having a hard time getting open. What more evidence do you need to run the ball? Instead the Pats played scared because they thought Peyton would score a lot more and they felt inclined to abandon the run to try to win the game in a shootout. The only thing they shot was themselves in the foot. I'll be keeping a close eye on little Joshy.


SECOND, RODNEY

I don't think I have to tell you that the Pats will be in trouble without Rodney for the next 7-8 weeks. Let's not forget to route hardily against Seattle so we can get a high draft pick for Branch and maybe get a safety to eventually replace Rodney. That being said, I personally don't have faith in Pioli's ability to draft a safety. Who have they drafted?
Guss Scott, Dexter Reid and James Sanders, seen any of THOSE guys lately? This year they drafted Willie Andrews and he's been so good they turned him into a WR. Don't forget that Eugene Wilson was drafted as a corner and turned into a safety as a necessity. His play has steadily declined. Maybe they can get a new safety via free agency this off-season, Harrison worked out pretty well wouldn't you say?


THIRD, WHATS HAPPENED TO THIS TEAM AGAINST QUALITY OPPONENTS?

Remember when they could beat anyone? Do you still have that feeling, because I don't. In their last 16 games against teams over .500 the Pats are 8-8. EIGHT and freakin' EIGHT!
In their last 5 games against the Colts and Broncos the Pats are 0-5, been outscored 139-81, and have 12 turnovers. We'll all get back on the bandwagon when they Pats go 7-1 or 8-0 in the second half of the season, but until they actually win another 'Big' game they've got something to prove.


LASTLY, A MORE OPTOMISTIC, HAPPY BLOGGER

Things can only get better in the second half of the season. Not that 6-2 to start is bad, but we all know they could have played much better in every game, with the exception of Minnesota. This is what can go right the rest of the way:

1. Brady and the receivers will only get better. As the weeks go by they can work on getting on 'the same page' whatever that means.

2. Maroney and Jackson. It's becoming obvious that Maroney is the man in the backfield and it is a disgrace that he only got the ball 4 times in the second half vs Indy. He and Jackson will emerge as big time threats in this offense as the playoffs approach.

3. A rediculously easy schedule makes 8-0 the rest of the way a real possibility and 7-1 a probablility. I think 6-2 would be disappointing.

4. Belichick's history. Since 2000 the Pats are 27-21 in the first half of the season and 46-13 in the second half, including the 10-1 playoff record. It's hard to argue with those results.


I'll be looking to post my own midseason grades in the next day or two.

Don't forget to check out our friends at TheBruinsReport.blogspot.com for all your Bruins news and info, now with a podcast!

3 comments:

Anonymous said...

First of all, don't let Barry read this comment:

"I'll give you that, but then the blame is squarely on Brady for a terrible throw."

You can't blame Brady for anything. *rolls eyes*

Part of me actually thinks that the boys were holding something back this time. January football is much different than November football, especially when you live in Indy. Maybe the Pats WANT to play Indy at home, in a dome, and bring a hurt that the likes of Peyton have never seen. In the first half, they proved that they can stomp on the Colts when they want to and shove the ball down their throat. Why this theory stopped in the 2nd half? I guess we'll never know. We also know how awesome Brady is in any NFL dome, including the RCA. Maybe BB was just testing the waters in the hopes of orchestrating another Manning demise in the playoffs? BTW, most of this theory is just "grasping for straws" here.

You do have to admit, that there is a silver lining here. 5 turnovers, Brady looked horrible, the play calling sucked, and the refs were OBVIOUSLY payed off by Indy....and we only lost by 1 touchdown. Which may have been a different story if FAULKING FAULK held onto the FAULKING ball!!! All this against the "best" team in the NFL according to the "professionals." If we had at least one of those situations reversed, we could have taken that game easily.

Anonymous said...

I was lucky enough to get an SRO for that game. There was nothing more pleasing than when Adam missed that first kick....

AAAADDDDAAAMMMMM!!!!
AAAADDDDAAAMMMMM!!!!
AAAADDDDAAAMMMMM!!!!

We would have almost been able to say we had the better kicker that night, if the Polak didn't miss that 30-something yarder.

Russ said...

Thanks for the plug Tom, and don't forget - you need to come down and do a little Pats talk and plug your blog that influenced Me to start TBR. Tomorrow's Episode 3 and we've already got over 100 subscribers to the feed. Whenever you're free for 30 mins on a Sunday (not during a Pats game, natch) you need to come on down!!!!